Why does Kevin Potvin reject Larouche's 9/11 insight?

In Potvin's wiki entry, you can see that Kevin has rejected Larouche's insight despite Kevin himself having interpreted it wrong.

Quote
In regards to 9/11 conspiracy theories, he has stated that he does not believe the official version of the events on September 11, 2001 is any more credible than alternative explanations, including Lyndon Larouche's expert analysis recently updated to implicate British and Saudi intelligence http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2009/3627cover_blown_9_11.html.[8]
unquote
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Potvin

click on the subject line above for more on this.

Kevin Potvin's own 9/11 inside job-- on himself!

Click on the subject line above for more details. Kevin destroyed his own political career in Canada-- by misinterpreting 9/11. He thought that the event was an act against the USA by radical Islamic terrorists-- and he cheered that-- because he thinks the USA is inherently imperial and deserves to be stopped. He got it wrong. And he got it wrong so badly that what was a budding career with the Green Party was annihalated as swifly as the trade towers on 9/11. The most insightly and completely correct interpretation of 9/11 has been accomplished by Lyn Larouche-- which I recognized because I understand real USA history-- as Classical humanist history with the imperial elements being subversion by the British/Dutch/Saudi intel attempting to destroy the USA from within. Click on the subject line for more.